|
Translate this page Big Brother masks free speech in local film , Temecula teen wins award for film protesting censorshipFriday, October 24th, 2008 Issue 43, Volume 12.
Shelbi is a 17-year-old senior at Temecula Valley High School. Monday, she boarded an airliner to New York to receive the award – and the $500 cash prize – at the Rubin Museum of Art in Manhattan. Her film depicts a world in which the government – represented as men in black suits – suppresses free speech. The film begins with a teenager arriving at a political rally. The teen gets out and joins the protesters with picket signs in their hands. The film then moves on to show reenactments of real world events. One scene depicts the banning of "Plainsong," a book by Kent Haruf, from a school in Nevada. Men in black suits wearing transparent masks with painted-on smiles confiscate the books from a group of students. Later, the film shows the students wearing the plastic masks. Another scene depicts a boy being expelled from a private school for listening to rock music at home. When the boy arrives home, he is wearing the same plastic mask. The film ends with men in black breaking up the protest and arresting some of the protesters. When the first teenager to appear in the film returns to her car she, too, is wearing a mask. The movie lacks dialogue. The only audio is a strange, ambient musical track by post-rock group Sigur Rós. The result is an eerily silent but highly communicative four-minute film. "I wanted to make it creepy. I wanted the masks and a creepy feel," Shelbi said. The masks represent the uniformity people attain when their freedom of speech is taken from them. "I wanted something that would silence Advertisement Shelbi’s favorite book, George Orwell’s "1984," influenced her heavily. "The masks make the ideal citizen," she said. The National Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC) organized the fifth annual Youth Film Contest to challenge US students 18 and younger to craft a message about free speech for the next president. "Young people are aware that they are often pawns in the censorship wars," Joan E. Bertin, NCAC’s executive director, stated in a press release. "Many have seen books, artwork and theater pieces challenged in their schools and communities." Shelbi illustrated examples of real-life censorship affecting high schools students because she wanted her film to appeal to young people, she said in an interview last week. "I want [high school students] to know what [freedoms] they need to demand," she said. The value of free speech is important to impress upon people while they are young, said Brian Pickett, NCAC’s youth programs coordinator, said in an interview. "With a presidential election predicting historically high youth turnout, the winning films demonstrate that young Americans clearly see how governmental policy affects their personal lives," Pickett stated in a press release. Shelbi found out about the contest through an Internet service called Fastweb, which e-mails her information about scholarships regarding film studies. The contest came at a good time because she was already thinking about making a film over the summer. "I already wanted to make a summer project," she said. "I wanted to do a music video." Shelbi put the entire film together in less than one month after finding out about the contest, she said. NCAC is an alliance of 50 nonprofit organizations promoting free speech awareness. To view "Lost Expression," visit www.ncac.org/yfen.
1 comments
I came to the Temecula library to watch a video about the 9/11 WTC incident. I am familiar with the idea that the inititial crash of airliners into the towers was the cover for a computer controled demolition. The video titled Loose Change was one I hadn't seen and luckily it's free to watch on Google videos. Here however, we are not allowed to watch it. I was told if I wanted to question the matter I should talk to City Hall and they courteously gave me their number. It appears that whole categories of subjects are forbidden. Try Alex Jone's Terrorstorm or Endgame and see if you can watch them at the library? What is the common content in these films that makes them unsuitable for public evaluation? If they contain dangerous deceptions then why can't we have a written statement concerning them. If they contain dangerous truth, then who is at risk? If some forms of censorship are reasonable such as that blocking pornagraphy in the sight of children, or even incidental exposure of porn in public, at least there is an open rationale for it. How easy may it be then for tyrants to use something that is part of our common morality to lull us into complacent acceptance of the truly pernicious forms of censorship. How far one should go to resist this trend is a personal question. Will it lead to police harassment in the form of perjured reasons to jail you. Is there still time before such protests elicit the category of enemy combatant. |
![]() Most Commented 325 Medical marijuan... 166 Man hit, killed ... 165 Authorities seek... 120 Authorities dist... 115 Double fatality ... 114 Temecula mosque ... 114 22 suspected ill... 109 Bikers steering ... 105 Bonsall man (lon... 100 Preliminary hear... 100 Is Granite havin... 92 Father of 12-yea... 89 Easter earthquak... 86 Investigators se... 85 7.2 Baja Califor... |
|
The Valley News All contents copyright ©2012 |
About Us Earthquake Information Business Listings |
Contact Us Letter to the Editor Report a website error |
Sitemap Online Digital Edition RSS Feeds Login |