|
Translate this page Former head of mortgage company sentenced to 13 years for fraudMonday, February 1st, 2010 Issue 05, Volume 14.
John Richard Varner, 56, was one of 15 people convicted of ripping off the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and banks over a five-year span that began in 1997. Varner's four-week trial ended in April, when a Riverside jury found him guilty of conspiracy to defraud a government agency, bank fraud and two counts of subscribing false income tax returns. Varner was the president of Mortgage One Corp. in Hesperia, which has since closed. According to federal prosecutors, the firm, together with Riverside-based M-1 Capital Corp., packaged, financed and sold home loans, obtaining mortgage insurance from the Federal Housing Administration, an agency of HUD. The companies received "Direct Endorsement Lender'' status, which often exempted them from federal scrutiny, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office. Prosecutors said the defendants submitted false documents, including bogus audit reports, to keep the preferred status and mislead federal officials. According to the U.S. Attorney's Advertisement A number of loans were sold to banks, including Firstar Bank, N.A. -- which has since been absorbed by U.S. Bank -- and Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp., according to prosecutors. More than 900 of the 3,813 federally insured loans approved by Mortgage One and M-1 ended up in default, resulting in nearly $30 million in taxpayer loses, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office. The losses incurred by lenders were not immediately known. Varner was convicted of intentionally omitting a number of assets from his 1999 and 2000 income tax returns, including a Corvette, a recreational vehicle and jewelry. In sentencing papers, Assistant U.S. Attorney Sheri Pym said Varner's testimony "consisted of a series of breathtaking lies that appeared designed to shift responsibility for the defendant's crimes to others.'' U.S. District Judge Virginia Phillips agreed, noting during his sentencing hearing that the defendant's testimony was "knowingly untruthful on a number of points.'' 0 comments Be the first to share your opinion on this article! |
![]() Most Commented 325 Medical marijuan... 166 Man hit, killed ... 165 Authorities seek... 120 Authorities dist... 115 Double fatality ... 114 Temecula mosque ... 114 22 suspected ill... 109 Bikers steering ... 105 Bonsall man (lon... 100 Preliminary hear... 100 Is Granite havin... 92 Father of 12-yea... 89 Easter earthquak... 86 Investigators se... 85 7.2 Baja Califor... |
|
The Valley News All contents copyright ©2012 |
About Us Earthquake Information Business Listings |
Contact Us Letter to the Editor Report a website error |
Sitemap Online Digital Edition RSS Feeds Login |