The Valley News
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
Translate this page

Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake sobriety checkpoints net many arrests, violations


Sunday, June 20th, 2010
Issue 24, Volume 14.


LAKE ELSINORE - No one was arrested for DUI at a sobriety checkpoint in Lake Elsinore, but five people were arrested for other offenses, 58 motorists were ticketed and 28 vehicles were towed, a sheriff's sergeant said today.

Officers screened 1,457 vehicles at last night's checkpoint at Lake Street and Grand Avenue, according to Sgt. Marc Cloutier.

Five motorists were given field sobriety tests, but none were taken into custody.

One person was arrested for possession of illegal drugs and another on a warrant stemming from a vehicle theft, Cloutier said.

Three other people were taken into custody on misdemeanor charges.

In addition Advertisement
Advertisement for Berry-Bell and Hall Mortuary
[ Berry-Bell and Hall Mortuary ]
to the arrests, 58 motorists were cited for various vehicle code violations including lacking valid drivers licenses, and 28 vehicles were towed.

Funding for the operation was provided by a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

In Canyon Lake, one person was arrested on suspicion of drunken driving and 32 vehicles were towed at a sobriety checkpoint.

Deputies screened 1,896 vehicles at the Friday evening checkpoint and gave field sobriety tests to 15 motorists, Sgt. Dan Lingo said.

Thirty-six motorists were cited for lacking valid drivers licenses and 32 vehicles were towed, Lingo said.


 

13 comments


Comment Profile Imageabe linkin
Comment #1 | Sunday, Jun 20, 2010 at 2:16 pm
Congratulations. You didn't fight or stop any actual crime but you did make a large amount of revenue at the expense of every day Americans struggling in this economy which bureaucratic scum like you created. Making their lives a living hell, taking away their vehicles which they need to support their families. Driving is a privilege my a... It's a necessity.

Comment Profile Imagelambkins
Comment #2 | Monday, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:10 am
Abe driving IS a priviledge. And if you don't have a license, you shouldn't be driving. Thank you to our local police for keeping our roads safe.

Comment Profile ImagehatinCA
Comment #3 | Monday, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:10 am
True True! I saw the families taking the carseats out and walking home as their car was towed away. Little kids force to walk home because mom and dad were late with CA registration which is outrageously expensive. The government did a great job separating the classes so we don't get together and over throw the government. They cause us to hate each other so we don't focus on them.

Comment Profile Imagedrjusmc
Comment #4 | Monday, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:42 am
Amazing, Escondido isnt the only town with unlicensed Drivers.

Comment Profile ImageMove if you don't like it
Comment #5 | Monday, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:42 am
If you can't afford to register and insure your cars, then don't drive them. It's that simple. If you don't like the cost of it, then move to another state.

Comment Profile ImageGregSr
Comment #6 | Tuesday, Jun 22, 2010 at 4:51 am
This is a country of laws. You can't pick and choose which laws you will ignore or obey. I have to pay higher insurance premiums to cover those who drive without insurance. Is that fair? If I have to keep a valid license, valid registration and keep my insurance up to date, so should everyone else.

A very high percentage of fatal car accidents are caused by unlicensed drivers. If one of them hits a loved one in your family, how will you feel about unlicensed drivers then?

Comment Profile Imagewhatever
Comment #7 | Tuesday, Jun 22, 2010 at 1:23 pm
What happened to freedom of speech
Comment Continued : The comment above was written from the same location.Post Continued
Comment Profile Imageapproved
Comment #8 | Tuesday, Jun 22, 2010 at 1:24 pm
Can't the police find all these hard core criminals during the course of a normal work day.
Comment Continued : The comment above was written from the same location.Post Continued
Comment Profile Imagewhere's just is
Comment #9 | Tuesday, Jun 22, 2010 at 1:24 pm
Why cant the cops find all of these hard core violators during the course of their normal work day?
Comment Continued : The comment above was written from the same location.Post Continued
Comment Profile Imagewhere"s just is
Comment #10 | Tuesday, Jun 22, 2010 at 1:24 pm
It's not enough that the cops fins all these "hard core level 4" violaters durring the course of their normal work day...they set up traps and call them "checkpoints".
Comment Continued : The comment above was written from the same location.Post Continued
Comment Profile Imagewhere's just is
Comment #11 | Tuesday, Jun 22, 2010 at 1:24 pm
It's not enough that the cops find all of these hard core level 4 violaters durring the course of a normal work day...They set up traps, call them "checkpoints", and screw people out of what little they have. Anybody who has had the pleasure of dealing with one of the tow companies "on rotation" knows they are every bit as dirty as the ....long live osama obama....white man wake up!

Comment Profile Imageillegal checkpoint
Comment #12 | Monday, Mar 21, 2011 at 4:31 am
"This is a country of laws. You can't pick and choose which laws you will ignore or obey"

I wish you were correct about this, then we wouldnt have this debate. The fact is checkpoints are and always have been unconstitutional. The courts mentioned this as they decide to ignore the fourth amendment back in 1990. They set up strict rules, on how the checkpoints would be conducted to offset the fact that the checkpoints were and are illegal. Those strict rules have fallen to the lowest priority, in fact many departments now do exactly the opposite of the guidelines, trying to trap motorists, rather then warn them well in advance so they can choose to not go through a check point.
I could go on and on, but just wanted to mention that you might be correct that I or some cant pick which laws we will obey....but the fact is that the courts and police departments do.
Its very nice of you to decide you dont want or need your constitutional rights, but some might disagree. Maybe you could move to another country with less rights rather then expect everyone else to give up theirs.
If you werent so sure it wouldnt affect you, you would think otherwise.
Comment Continued : The comment above was written from the same location.Post Continued
Comment Profile Imageillgal checkpoint
Comment #13 | Monday, Mar 21, 2011 at 4:40 am
one(or more) last thing. Checkpoints by law are supposed to be placed in locations with large volume of dui accidents or tickets creating a hazard that needs to be remedied...thus the compromise of our 4th amendment rights... in the name of safety.
Well that is BS even if thats how it worked.
But read this story and stats.
!No DUI! Not one single DUI, yet 58 tickets and 28 vehicles towed.
Sounds like they were dishonest about the location they picked for the checkpoint. (no drunken drivers to be found.)
Also dishonest about the purpose for the invasion on civil rights.(unlicensed drivers and impounded vehicles with hefty fines.)

I am sure the checkpoint was considered a success, based on the cars stolen, and people screwed out of their transportation and money to eat.
If they judged it honestly on the 0 dui total...I guess they would no longer conduct these warantless searches.
I no you wont agree. But just the same, I wish you freedom and liberty, and you can continue hoping something bad happens to others based on their citizenship.

Is it all people are created equal. or all people born in the US created equal.

Article Comments are contributed by our readers, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Valley News staff. The name listed as the author for comments cannot be verified; Comment authors are not guaranteed to be who they claim they are.

 

Add your Comment


Name

Images, Formatting, or HTML is not allowed : plain text only. You may post up to 5 website addresses within your comment.
Disclaimer

The Valley News has tightened its' policy regarding comments.
While we invite you to contribute your opinions and thoughts, we request that you refrain from using vulgar or obscene words and post only comments that directly pertain to the specific topic of the story or article.
Comments that are derogatory in nature have a high likelihood for editing or non-approval if they carry the possibility of being libelous.
The comment system is not intended as a forum for individuals or groups to air personal grievances against other individuals or groups.
Please, no advertising or trolling.
In posting a comment for consideration, users understand that their posts may be edited as necessary to meet system parameters, or the post may not be approved at all. By submitting a comment, you agree to all the rules and guidelines described here.
Most comments are approved or disregarded within one business day.



RSS Feed
Online Digital Edition
Sign up  for iNews
Earthquake Information

Other VNN Sites
The Village News
Temecula Valley News
Anza Valley Outlook
Fallbrook.org
Sourcebook

Advertisement for Get Ready 2 Go
Reach Local Customers



Most Commented
The Valley News The Valley News
760-723-7319 - 127 West Elder Street, Fallbrook CA 92028
All contents copyright ©2012
About Us
Earthquake Information
Business Listings
Contact Us
Letter to the Editor
Report a website error
Sitemap
Online Digital Edition
RSS Feeds
Login