|
Translate this page Supervisors Ratify Ordinance Regulating Homemade FoodsTuesday, January 29th, 2013 Issue 05, Volume 17.
In a 4-0 vote, with Supervisor John Tavaglione absent, the board enacted a measure defining so-called "cottage food" operations and establishing the conditions under which they're allowed to conduct business. The ordinance takes effect in 30 days. Cottage foods were placed on the state's list of public health concerns with the passage of Assembly Bill 1616, which Gov. Jerry Brown signed into law in September. The statute requires that counties establish standards for cottage food makers and require them to be licensed. Cottage foods generally include custards, meat fillings, candies, dried fruits, cereals, herbs, nuts, roasted coffees, dried teas and baked goods without cream, according to the county Department of Environmental Health. Under the ordinance, there are two classes of cottage food operators. Class "A" is defined as a home-based cook who engages in sales to an established clientele or at events, such as a temporary booth at a sports venue. Class "B" is defined as Advertisement County officials said that a class A operator will be exempt from inspections unless there are consumer complaints about products. However, class B operators will be subject to an initial inspection of their preparation areas -- kitchens -- as well as annual inspections. Class A permits will cost $72.50 each; class B certificates will cost $290. Permits will have to be renewed annually. All cottage food makers will be required to meet minimum basic food handling standards defined in the California Health and Safety Code. Regulations include keeping utensils and surfaces clean; keeping children or potentially contagious people out of the preparation area; frequent hand- washing; and no smoking. All operators will need to complete a food processor course within three months of registering with the county. According to officials, cottage foods must be properly labeled, using the words "Made in a Home Kitchen" or similar language to be in compliance with the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. Permit-holders who commit violations could face fines ranging from $100 to $500. 1 comments
The fact that we as taxpayers pay these people to come up with more laws and more regulations is so ironic. We are paying for our own enslavement, slowly, but surely choking. |
The Village NewsAnza Valley OutlookFallbrook.orgSourcebookOnline Digital EditionCoupon CornerSign up for iNewsEarthquake Info ![]() Most Commented 352 Medical marijuan... 260 Arrests now numb... 173 Authorities seek... 168 Man hit, killed ... 120 Authorities dist... 116 22 suspected ill... 116 Double fatality ... 114 Temecula mosque ... 113 Bikers steering ... 107 Bonsall man (lon... 105 Preliminary hear... 105 U.S. Marine corp... 103 Is Granite havin... 96 Father of 12-yea... 95 Huell Howser of ... ![]() |
|
The Valley News All contents copyright ©2013
|
About Us Earthquake Information Business Listings |
Contact Us Letter to the Editor Report a website error |
Sitemap Online Digital Edition RSS Feeds Login |





Recent Video




