Translate this page

A dozen Riverside County School Districts facing financial difficulties


Tuesday, March 5th, 2013
Issue 10, Volume 17.


RIVERSIDE -- A dozen school districts in Riverside County may come up short paying their bills in the next couple of years, according to a report released today by the California Department of Education.

State Superintendent of Schools Tom Torlakson posted a status report on school districts' finances midway through fiscal year 2012-13, and according to the document, the following 12 districts in Riverside County are at risk of having insufficient funds between now and 2015-16:

-- Banning Unified School District;

-- Coachella Valley Unified School District;

-- Desert Sands Unified School District;

-- Hemet Unified School District;

-- Jurupa Unified School District;

-- Lake Elsinore Unified School District;

-- Menifee Union Elementary School District;

-- Murrieta Valley Unified School District;

-- Palo Verde Unified School District;

-- Perris Union High School District;

-- Temecula Valley Unified School District; and

-- Val Verde Unified School District.

The districts were among 117 statewide that received Advertisement
Advertisement for Pala Mesa Resort
[ Pala Mesa Resort ]
a "qualified certification" designation, indicating they could fail to meet their financial obligations this fiscal year or in the next two.

None of the county's school districts received a "negative certification," which implies they're destitute.

The qualified certification provides an opportunity for a county's Office of Education to step in and lend whatever assistance may be needed to address funding issues, according to state officials.

Altogether, 124 local educational agencies in California received a qualified or negative certification, comprising just under 12 percent of the 1,043 LEAs statewide, according to Torlakson.

"I can say with growing confidence that the worst of California's school funding crisis is behind us," Torlakson said. "As this report demonstrates, it will take years to restore our education system to financial health. No one was happy to see California slip to 49th in per-pupil funding, and no one should be satisfied when we move up to 46th or 47th."


 

3 comments


Comment Profile Imagepaullywog
Comment #1 | Tuesday, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:28 pm
yes yes yes its for the kids. The tax increases-the tax increases-its not for the teacher's unions! Not for the $85,000 salaries for 8 months of work!!?? I mean these districts are going bankrupt because the influence of the California Teacher's union. The most influential theft grabbers of modern history. 49th in funding? Really? I think that is a load of crap. Our kids are still failing no matter how much money you shovel to the schools. I remember in the 1980's we had to increase funding and reduce class size. No changes in anything occured. Teachers got their pay increases and graduation rates stayed the same. Then the 90's came and the same old same old. Now the 2000's have passed and it is more worse than ever! Lottery money went to the schools-they can't even find where it went???!!!Oh my these districts just don't get it.Neither do the unions.Neither do the low infromation voters of California.

Comment Profile Imageamenpaullywog
Comment #2 | Thursday, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:50 am
You hit the nail on the head. They can only tax those that make a living by working so much until all the money is gone. Yet California voters keep voting for more taxes because they want more freebies. Not one major media outlet will highlight the fact more money isnt working. The unions are too focused on their income and not their productivity. Some teachers are great but others can't be replaced. How does that make sense. How about grades go up pay goes up, earn your raise, I do and am proud of it.

Comment Profile ImageMom of lots
Comment #3 | Thursday, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:48 pm
Suprise, surprise. You can't fix a broken system by throwing more $ at it. $ apparently is not a fix all because they have tons of it. I find it disgusting tht they'll be asking for more. It's only a matter of time.

Article Comments are contributed by our readers, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Valley News staff. The name listed as the author for comments cannot be verified; Comment authors are not guaranteed to be who they claim they are.

 

Add your Comment


Name

Images, Formatting, or HTML is not allowed : plain text only. You may post up to 5 website addresses within your comment.
Disclaimer

The Valley News has tightened its policy regarding comments.
While we invite you to contribute your opinions and thoughts, we request that you refrain from using vulgar or obscene words and post only comments that directly pertain to the specific topic of the story or article.
Comments that are derogatory in nature have a high likelihood for editing or non-approval if they carry the possibility of being libelous.
The comment system is not intended as a forum for individuals or groups to air personal grievances against other individuals or groups.
Please, no advertising or trolling.
In posting a comment for consideration, users understand that their posts may be edited as necessary to meet system parameters, or the post may not be approved at all. By submitting a comment, you agree to all the rules and guidelines described here.
Most comments are approved or disregarded within one business day.



RSS FeedFacebookTwitter



Subscribe



Advertisement for Temecula Dining




Most Commented


Reach Local Customers



The Valley News The Valley News
760-723-7319 - 127 West Elder Street, Fallbrook CA 92028
All contents copyright ©2013
About Us
Earthquake Information
Business Listings
Contact Us
Letter to the Editor
Report a website error
Sitemap
Online Digital Edition
RSS Feeds
Login