Translate this page

California State Fire Tax

Saturday, July 12th, 2014
Issue 28, Volume 18.

Dear Editor,

We have received our third billing for the California State Fire Tax. The state apparently thinks it has been working, but it seems to me that we have had more and larger wildfires since the tax became a California legislature’s dream. How naive I was to think the tax money would be used to reduce wildfires in urban regions of California. I think the sad results after two years pretty well shows that the tax is a failure and that it is being spent unwisely. Should they keep collecting money for a failed program? I think it is bad enough to have to pay discriminatory taxes for a successful venture, but to pay it for a failed venture is not right. California’s answer to everything seems to be, just add a tax.

It is time for the state to release the actual results of this tax, exactly how much money has been collected and exactly where has it been spent. It Advertisement
Advertisement for Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce
[ Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce ]
would also be interesting to find out if the state even has that information. Last year I paid both of my Fire Tax bills only to be billed again for one of them with penalty fees added. Since I had not received my cancelled checks I did not know if both checks had been cashed so I paid the second billing. Then when I did get my checks back I found that both the original checks had been cashed. I was putting together a package to request a refund when a refund check was received from the state. So I know they have problems accounting for the money collected and I assume that they also have problems with accounting for the money spent. The Fire Tax money has obviously not been spent where needed so if nothing improves I think the State Board of Equalization should be charged with collecting money under false pretenses.

Respectfully submitted,

Harry M. Quinn

Mountain Center



Comment Profile ImageRuben
Comment #1 | Saturday, Jul 12, 2014 at 10:10 pm
We never voted for this additional tax. However I'm not against this tax PER SAY, BUT! did the elected officials forget that this tax goes against Proposition 13, that was voted in by the people of California many years ago? Again, I'm not against this tax if it is really needed but allow us to vote on this matter before imposing/changing what we already voted on.
That is why every time when we mail out our payment we post on the check "payment under protest". I feel that proposition 13 still stands although nobody seems to care.

Comment Profile ImageMichelle Bedard
Comment #2 | Sunday, Jul 13, 2014 at 7:10 am
Why is it that some are paying and others are not paying the California State Fire Tax? I live in an area that is suppose to be high fire area so I am privileged with paying the tax. We have not had a fire in our area since 2003 and that was arson. So I have to pay tax because an arsonist decided to start a wildfire over 10 years ago? How is that fair? We are vigilant in protecting our property as is our neighbors. Aren't our normal taxes going to fight fires? When is enough, enough?
Comment Profile Imagebob k
Comment #3 | Sunday, Jul 13, 2014 at 12:24 pm
Well, I have to agree, California's answer to everything seems to be, just add a tax. How much more can the people take? That's my question. The piling on of taxes and regulations is overwhelming.

Article Comments are contributed by our readers, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Valley News staff. The name listed as the author for comments cannot be verified; Comment authors are not guaranteed to be who they claim they are.


Add your Comment


Images, Formatting, or HTML is not allowed : plain text only. You may post up to 5 website addresses within your comment.


The Valley News has tightened its' policy regarding comments.
While we invite you to contribute your opinions and thoughts, we request that you refrain from using vulgar or obscene words and post only comments that directly pertain to the specific topic of the story or article.
Comments that are derogatory in nature have a high likelihood for editing or non-approval if they carry the possibility of being libelous.
The comment system is not intended as a forum for individuals or groups to air personal grievances against other individuals or groups.
Please, no advertising or trolling.
In posting a comment for consideration, users understand that their posts may be edited as necessary to meet system parameters, or the post may not be approved at all. By submitting a comment, you agree to all the rules and guidelines described here.
Most comments are approved or disregarded within one business day.

RSS FeedFacebookTwitter

Advertisement for Crown Hill Pizza


Most Commented

Reach Local Customers

The Valley News The Valley News
760-723-7319 - 1588 S. Mission Rd. Suite 200, Fallbrook CA 92028
All contents copyright ©2015
About Us
Earthquake Information
Business Listings
Contact Us
Letter to the Editor
Report a website error
Online Digital Edition
RSS Feeds