Translate this page
The plan would be carried out as anyone who cultivates more than a dozen plants would be charged with a misdemeanor, face fines of $1,000 or more and could spend up to six months in jail.
The plan would be carried out as anyone who cultivates more than a dozen plants would be charged with a misdemeanor, face fines of $1,000 or more and ...

Supervisors move forward with plan to criminalize marijuana cultivation


Wednesday, July 30th, 2014
Issue 31, Volume 18.
Paul J. Young
Special to the Valley News


RIVERSIDE - Riverside County supervisors unanimously agreed today to draft regulations aimed at deterring large-scale marijuana growing operations in the unincorporated communities.

"We have an explosion of grow yards in the First District, and they're not small insofar as the numbers of plants go," said Supervisor Kevin Jeffries. "My goal is to go after the large commercial growers. The fines need to be high enough to justify code enforcement officers and sheriff's deputies going after them."

Jeffries said he was prompted to seek an "interim ordinance" prohibiting marijuana grows after taking a walking tour through parts of his district and personally counting eight cultivation operations. He conservatively estimated the total number of grows in Good Hope, Meadowbrook and Mead Valley to be upwards of 250.

"Many of the neighbors are scared to death," the supervisor said, noting in documents posted to the Board of Supervisors' agenda that "the proliferation of marijuana groves increases the risk of criminal activity, degradation of the natural environment, and often results in illegal electrical and water connections and alterations."

The county has an ordinance on the books prohibiting storefront marijuana dispensaries in the unincorporated areas, but there are no specific provisions targeting marijuana grows. Jeffries noted that such activity is impliedly banned at the local level. But to find any definitive prohibition, officials have to look to the federal Controlled Substances Act.

The supervisor said most of the cannabis farms are run by two well-known drug cartels, which mark their territory with graffiti on poles and other objects.

Under the proposed interim ordinance, anyone who cultivates less than a dozen marijuana plants in an unincorporated community would be charged with an infraction, facing fines ranging from $10 to $200.

Anyone who cultivates more than a dozen plants would be charged with a misdemeanor, facing penalties that include fines of $1,000 or more and six months in jail.

A number of speakers turned out to challenge the proposed restrictions, most of them self-identifying as medical marijuana users or cultivators.

"My wife is medicated with marijuana to treat a number of ailments, including fibromyalgia," said Riverside-area resident William Gunn. "I couldn't depend on anyone to provide what she required, so I started growing on my own. I've been able to take care of my wife that way for the last six, seven years."

Inland Empire resident Karen Taylor told the board she had to start her own mini grow because the prices charged by dispensaries Advertisement
Advertisement for Children's Lighthouse
[ Children's Lighthouse ]
were "very high."

"A ban like this would be detrimental to me and my family's health," Taylor said.

Medical marijuana user Thomas Ross told Jeffries he was overreacting to "the most innocuous drug in the world."

"When I got ill, doctors kept trying to push Norco on me. I said 'no way,' went home, had a puff with a single malt -- all was well," Ross said.

Longtime marijuana legalization activist Lanny Swerdlow said a blanket crackdown on marijuana growers was out of step with the times.

"You need to get innovative instead of falling back on that old prohibition mentality," Swerdlow said. "Why make (growing a dozen or fewer cannabis plants) illegal unless you're looking to sock it to patients?"

Swerdlow and others pointed to developments in Colorado, where recreational marijuana use became legal on Jan. 1, in arguing against Jeffries' proposal.

Board members' views were largely in sync, though Chairman Jeff Stone leaned to the perspective of medical cannabis advocates, citing his experiences as a pharmacist.

"There is a need for the medication," he said. "I would hope this ordinance would go after organized efforts to do nothing but make money and peddle weed to youngsters for recreational use. But there shouldn't be a witch hunt of citizens who need and use the drug in the privacy of their homes."

Supervisor John Benoit said during his three decades as a California Highway Patrol officer, he had witnessed a number of "lives ruined by marijuana and other drugs."

"The bottom line is, it's illegal," Benoit said. "When it comes to land-use issues, we do have the authority (to establish regulations)."

He conceded that there should be allowances for those wanting only to "realize the benefits" of medical marijuana, which was legalized under Proposition 215, the Compassionate Use Act of 1996.

Jeffries offered to work with Stone to craft a regulatory framework that takes into account the needs of medical marijuana users, separating them from the main target of his effort -- commercial growers.

With Stone's consent and the balance of the board concurring, a public hearing was tentatively set for Sept. 23, when the interim ordinance will be formally introduced.

It would take effect immediately and remain active for 45 days, giving the Office of County Counsel sufficient time to draft a permanent amendment to the county's zoning law, establishing a blanket prohibition on marijuana grows "in all zone classifications" -- agricultural, commercial, residential, etc.


 

5 comments

Comment Profile ImageSandydog5
Comment #1 | Wednesday, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:22 am
"Good Hope, Meadowbrook and Mead Valley" Let's see, how many minorities live in these areas? When I lived out there you could count the blondes on one hand. Not a surprise the county would go after 'low income' minorities.
Comment Profile ImageJ.Schnetzer
Comment #2 | Wednesday, Jul 30, 2014 at 2:18 pm
If you do not allow people to grow this plant for themselves, then the drug dealing cartels will win. The cartels will continue to trade other dangerous drugs for the higher valus and inturn purchase weapons to fight your police. However if you allw these people to grow their own and resist cartel funding, everyone wins. A dozen plants may not be enough of a medicine for an entire year for a new grower, more than 50% may become male and be removed. Many times plants get damaged, if an unexperienced growers crop goes bad, this season he might have to buy from cartels. Riverside needs to decide who is causing harm the cartels or those Cannabis consumers who do not want to fund cartels for an herb that is far less dangerous than Alcohol.
Comment Profile ImageCharles
Comment #3 | Wednesday, Jul 30, 2014 at 9:07 pm
Mister President Tear down those marijuana laws
Comment Profile Imagenotdoper
Comment #4 | Friday, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:22 am
It's the cartel backed gangs doing the massive growing. Read the article.
Comment Profile ImageHELL IN HEMET
Comment #5 | Monday, Sep 22, 2014 at 1:03 am
The neighbor has 2 sons each have been incarcerated on drug charges, one for 7 years. The other is always getting arrested. Her boyfriend has been arrested for mail fraud, Identity theft, stolen mail, chop shop, drug charges, and each has a medical marijuana card and now they invite all their low life friends and their friends and their friends to "get well" The cars block neighbors mailboxes, driveways, and the smell as children walk to end of the street to high school. They urinate on my house, it smelled awful, The amount of the low life visitors is amazing, coming in old barely running cars, rattling, with loud mufflers, people who looked so filthy bring things they have found to trade, dragging debris on their bicycles, working on cars all night, it's a nightmare. I am going to federal court to get relief. I do not trust my officials to keep me from having to live with my neighbors crap.

Article Comments are contributed by our readers, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Valley News staff. The name listed as the author for comments cannot be verified; Comment authors are not guaranteed to be who they claim they are.

 

Add your Comment


Name

Images, Formatting, or HTML is not allowed : plain text only. You may post up to 5 website addresses within your comment.




Disclaimer

The Valley News has tightened its' policy regarding comments.
While we invite you to contribute your opinions and thoughts, we request that you refrain from using vulgar or obscene words and post only comments that directly pertain to the specific topic of the story or article.
Comments that are derogatory in nature have a high likelihood for editing or non-approval if they carry the possibility of being libelous.
The comment system is not intended as a forum for individuals or groups to air personal grievances against other individuals or groups.
Please, no advertising or trolling.
In posting a comment for consideration, users understand that their posts may be edited as necessary to meet system parameters, or the post may not be approved at all. By submitting a comment, you agree to all the rules and guidelines described here.
Most comments are approved or disregarded within one business day.

RSS FeedFacebookTwitter



Advertisement for Crown Hill Pizza





Subscribe


Most Commented


Reach Local Customers



The Valley News The Valley News
760-723-7319 - 1588 S. Mission Rd. Suite 200, Fallbrook CA 92028
All contents copyright ©2014
About Us
Earthquake Information
Business Listings
Contact Us
Letter to the Editor
Report a website error
Sitemap
Online Digital Edition
RSS Feeds
Login